logo logo

Europe is the huge home of the old and the new democracies which guarantee the freedom and prosperity of all citizens within the Union. Ironically, the name 'Europe' is given to us by the Phoenicians from which emerge associations for the material and the money. Centuries later, the European Union is an example for all mankind to the rule of law and moral values. The coordinates of a better life, guaranteed human rights and freedoms are all here. Each resident of the European Union must feel the European Parliament as a guarantor of human achievements which give freedom, prosperity, peace. This Parliament is the heart of democracy in Europe!

Nedjmi Ali

Member of the European Parliament,
Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE)

Actual news

Nedzhmi Ali on the protection of the Union´s budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member states

N. Ali Rule of law - Родопи

This statement was presented at the Plenary session of the European parliament in Strasbourg on 16.01.2019 in the presence of Günther Oettinger, EU Commissioner for Budget & Human Resources.

Thank you Mr. Chair.   Dear Commissioner Oettinger, colleagues,

In order to protect the Union’s budget and financial interests for the next MFF we need a new regulation that is not a sanctioning mechanism but rather a tool to ensure sound financial management.

The regulation includes under the term “rule of law” all the Union values enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty of functioning of EU and in the Copenhagen criteria for Union membership, including fundamental rights. A generalised deficiency as regards the rule of law may affect the principles of sound financial management or the protection of the financial interests of the Union.

The Commission should establish an Advisory panel of independent experts which would undertake an independent annual assessment of the rule of law situation in all Member States. Commission, when making its decisions, should take into account the relevant Panel´s opinion.

In order to strengthen the protection of final recipients or beneficiaries, in the regulation are proposed additional measures. The Commission shall also ensure that any amount due by government entities or Member States is paid to the beneficiaries.

A positive characteristic of the regulation is that the Parliament is put on an equal footing with the Council in the process of adopting or lifting the respective measures. Commission submits a proposal to the Parliament and the Council, to transfer to a budgetary reserve the respective amounts, which would enter into force only if both institutions do not reject it. 

Nedzhmi Ali on the Annual Report on the control of the Financial Activities of the European Investment Bank for 2017

N Ali - EIB - Rodopi

This statement was presented during the Plenary debate on 16.01.2019 in Strasbourg in the presence of Werner Hoyer, Executive director of the EIB and Jyrki Katainen, EU Commissioner for Jobs, Growth, Investment and Competitiveness.

Thank you Mr. Chair, Dear Commissioner Katainen, Mr. Hoyer, colleagues,

Pivotal role of the Bank is to ensure a value-adding strategic public investment supporting the sustainable growth and creating high-value jobs within the EU. As an example the overall finance approved by the EIB Group within the EU in 2015-2016, will support 544 billion EUR of investment, add 2.3% to GDP and create 2.25 million jobs by year 2020.

In 2017 the EIB successfully achieved its objectives, implementing EU policy in line with its mission and as detailed in its Operational Plan. The Bank lending signatures reached almost 70 billion EUR, of which 90% within the Union. This financial resource was dedicated to four strategic areas: innovation and skills; infrastructure; environmental projects; as well as SMEs and midcaps. The SMEs received more than 40% of the whole sum, which is in correspondence with their role as backbone of the European economy. Results would be better with proactive policy and increasing the funding to these enterprises.

We are satisfied with the conclusion of the Audit Committee that the Financial Statements adopted by the EIB Board of Directors present a true and fair view of the financial position of the Bank and of the results of its operations and cash-flows. A better corporate governance will be achieved paying greater attention to mid- and long-term effects when defining investment actions and its funding decisions.

In order to speed up the economic recovery in the Union and to help certain economic sectors and geographical areas to catch up, a major role plays the European Fund for strategic Investments (EFSI). With mobilised investments at the end of 2017, exceeding 207 billion EUR, EFSI is on the way to reach its goal. Despite the need to avoid some of the geographical imbalances, the improvement in transparency is visible with the publication of the EFSI Investment Committee decisions and the documents adopted by the Steering Board together with the minutes of the meetings.

Nedzhmi Ali on the establishing of an EU Anti-Fraud Programme

13-12-N. Ali CONT 1312 1 copy

This statement was presented during a meeting of the EP’s Budgetary control committee on 13.12.2018 in Strasbourg. Nedzhmi Ali (ALDE) was shadow rapporteur on this file.

Thank you Mme Chair, Mr. Salafranca, Dear colleagues,

First of all, I would like to congratulate the rapporteur for the presented draft report.

The proposal of the European Commission for establishing an EU Anti-Fraud Programme is timely and serves the goals not only to protect the financial interests of the Union but also to support the mutual administrative assistance between the customs´ authorities of the Member-states and the Commission.

We welcome the Commission´s proposal, establishing the EU Anti-Fraud Programme, streamlining the existing Hercule III Programme and two operational activities: the Anti-Fraud Information System (AFIS) and the Irregularity Management System (IMS). Expectations are to achieve increased synergies and budgetary flexibility, as well as simplified management.

Considering the budgetary implications within Article 3, due to the scope and importance of the Programme, we support the Parliamentary approach to increase substantially the financial resources.  In order to ease understanding of the financing, the overall financial envelope of the Programme for the period 2021-2027 is presented in current prices and necessary calculations are made to present the financing in constant 2018 prices. It is valid also for all three components of the Programme.

In conclusion, I would like to express again our positive attitude toward the proposed by the Commission programme. We expect this Programme, if properly implemented, to become an important element in the protection of Union´s financial interests.

Nedzhmi Ali on the Conclusion of a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with Turkmenistan

N. Ali AFET 1

This statement was presented during the meeting of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) on 6.12.2018 in Brussels. Nedzhmi Ali MEP was shadow from ALDE Group on this file.

Dear Mr. Chair, Ms Manescu (rapporteur), colleagues,

I would like to congratulate the rapporteur for the presented interim report that describes in a balanced way the history of relations between EU and Turkmenistan, as well as the latest development. We appreciate the approach in the report envisioning establishing a set of short-term benchmarks to measure the sustainable progress by the government and the long-term recommendations for sustainable and credible progress.

We may add some explanations in several areas:

Firstly, concerning the Human Rights there are positive steps such as the adoption of a comprehensive National Action Plan on Human Rights in 2016 and the nomination of the first Ombudsman, in accordance with the provisions of the revised Constitution. At the same time, there is still existing major gap between the legislative framework adopted by Turkmenistan and its effective implementation.

Secondly, Democracy. It is important to have a clear division between the executive, legislative and judiciary branches, including a consultation with international experts on the compliance of the Constitution of Turkmenistan with these democratic principles. In addition, we should underline the importance of respect for the principles of a pluralistic democracy.

Thirdly, the issue of a general lack of Transparency that still remains a problem in Turkmenistan. We should not underestimate the importance of showing openness to international scrutiny, international organizations and independent monitors. In this regard we should note the positive developments such as visits in 2017 of foreign diplomats to penitentiary facilities and the readiness of Turkmenistan to facilitate other such visits.

Fourthly, concerning the Turkmenistan’s contribution to the regional stability. Turkmenistan’s status of permanent neutrality has contributed to its role in promoting regional stability and in tackling common threats such as terrorism, violent extremism, illicit drug trafficking, and transnational organized crime. A decade long active presence of the UN Centre for Preventive Diplomacy in Ashgabat is a result of this policy of promoting regional dialogue and conflict prevention.

And finally, it is very important the European Parliament to be properly informed about the implementation of the human rights and democratization provisions of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement.

Nedzhmi Ali on the protection of the Union´s budget in case of generalised deficiencies as regards the rule of law in the Member states

29-11-N. Ali copy

This statement was presented during the joint BUDG/CONT meeting, which took place on Tuesday, 27.11.2018 in Brussels. N. Ali is shadow rapporteur for ALDE Group from the side of the Budgetary control committee for this complex mechanism.

Thank you, Mr. Chair, Dear rapporteurs, colleagues,

The necessity for the EU to deliver efficiently on its priorities is of paramount importance in the current moment of time, as we are coming close to the beginning of the new MFF (2021-2027). As already outlined, the most fundamental of these prerequisites are related to the rule of law.

I would like to note once again that we welcome the Commission´s proposal, as not only this document presents the regulatory framework for successfully funding of the EU budget, but it also underlines how important it is to protect the EU budget at every stage of its functioning.

Taking careful note of all amendments proposed to the text, we support the emphasis on the connection between the rule of law, fundamental rights and improvement of some of the basic definitions. We are also positive towards the proposed additions to the measures where a generalized deficiency as regards the rule of law in a member-state affects the principles of sound financial management or the protection of the Union´s financial interests. There is a need to create two things: a mechanism, which is as straightforward as possible, and a tool, which ensures the protection of beneficiaries. While the Commission has a set of ideas on this matter, organizing a constructive dialogue on this aspect would be very beneficial.

We also believe that there is a need to closely follow the regulatory guidelines. The proposed mechanism relates only to the Budget of the EU and in this sense, we need to keep it focused on what is most important. This regulation has to be created and embedded in the new Multiannual Financial Framework and in order to fulfill this we should continue with our constructive efforts.

Thank you.

Nedzhmi Ali on the Discharge 2017: General Budget of the EU – European parliament

N. Ali Rodopi

This statement was presented by Nedzhmi Ali MEP, ALDE Group, during the CONT Committee meeting on November 26th in Brussels.


Dear Mme Chair, Ms Schmidt, Mr. Welle, Mr. Sassoli, Mr. Russo, colleagues,

First of all, I would like to thank Parliament’s leadership for the detailed answers to the questions we have prepared within our Committee.

Concerning the most important characteristics of the European Parliament for year 2017 – the use of the financial resources as well as fulfilment of the objectives for that year, we could say that the results are encouraging. In 2017, when we had appropriations totalling 1.910 billion EUR, 99.0% of the budget was committed and only 0.9% had to be cancelled. Indeed, this proves the good management of the financial resources. At the same time, the objectives pursued and outcomes achieved during the year stem mainly from the priorities set by Parliament’s competent bodies when preparing the 2017 budget.

I would like to attract your attention also on several particular issues:

Firstly, something that is very important for us as members of the Committee on Budgetary Control – strengthening the in-house expertise on accounts and auditing that rapporteurs can make use of in the preparation of their discharge reports. We are satisfied with the internally created system that increases the CONT Secretariat´s quality of work.

Secondly, in relation to the provided by you detailed information about functioning of the House of European History. While our Union last several years experiences numerous challenges, we need to intensify the use of valuable assets like this in order to promote further the understanding of European history and European integration. From this point of view I believe that the numbers of visitors could be increased probably through a well targeted communication campaign.

Thirdly, in relation to the increase in the level of risk associated with legality and regularity, DG FINS set up the Compliance Monitoring Unit, reporting directly to the Director-General of DG Finance. We perceive in a fully positive way this approach. May you give us additional information how this Unit shares information with CONT and if there are some difficulties in this field how they could be overcome?

Nedzhmi Ali (ALDE) on the Draft report on the 2018 Commission Report on Turkey

22-11-N. Ali AFET 1 - rodopi copy

This statement was presented during a two-hour debate in AFET, the Foreign affairs committee of the European parliament, on 21.11.2018 in Brussels.

Thank you, Mr. Chair, Ms Piri, colleagues,

Firstly, I would like to congratulate the rapporteur for the report covering the large spectrum of events occurred in the envisioned period.

I would like to begin with a few words on the migration crisis. In her report, Ms Piri correctly points out that Turkey played an important role in tackling the migration crisis and that the Turkish people showed great hospitality by offering shelter to more than 3 million Syrian refugees. In the meantime, there is an information, for me as a representative of a border country, of Bulgaria, which is a neighbor of Turkey, that there is tension brewing in the country among the local population and refugees, because of the huge number of newly settled people – totaling almost 4 million people. Despite the enormous pressure, our partners have proven to be a stable force in this problematic situation.

Allow me to turn now to the economic side of things. The EU is Turkey’s number one trade partner, and Turkey is Europe’s sixth largest trade partner. The EU is the biggest foreign investor in Turkey and the latter is an important growth market for the EU, as correctly outlined by our rapporteur Ms Piri. In its report, the Commission goes into more detail, stating that Turkey is a well-advanced market economy and what is more, Turkey has continued to align with the acquis, although at a limited pace, largely due to the issues of migration and the coup. We need to keep these facts in mind when assessing the situation.

In this regard, I would like to turn to the main point – the call to formally suspend the accession negotiations with Turkey. I would like to ask Ms Piri, if this proposal is accepted, what would be the framework of cooperation between the two sides? In your report, on one side you mention the furthering of the customs union and visa liberalization, which I agree is very important, but on the other side you say that all accession negotiations should be stopped. How can we advance if we have frozen negotiations? If we declare commitment to the bilateral dialogue with Turkey, do you think that this scenario would bring us closer to our goals, if we burn all the bridges?

Overall, suspension of the negotiations would directly damage the Turkish civil society and will not contribute to bringing Turkish people closer to the EU, which is something we should not accept. And what kinds of messages are we sending to the civil society, because their opinion is just the opposite – to have more intensive dialogue. Thank you.